September 20, 2024 | by Unboxify
On an island near Shanghai, a massive industrial expansion is reshaping the landscape. Two decades ago, the island was unremarkable, but today it’s a shipbuilding powerhouse. China’s shipyards are driving the global maritime industry, dwarfing the capacity of the US and other naval powers. In 2023, China dominated the world’s commercial shipbuilding sector, while the US accounted for less than 1% of that market. This blog explores how China achieved this formidable status and what it could mean for the US in a protracted conflict.
San Diego’s Nassco shipyard is bustling with thousands of workers, driven by the largest naval shipbuilding budget in decades, $32 billion in 2023 alone. Despite this hefty investment, the US shipbuilding sector has significantly dwindled, while China’s shipbuilding capacity has expanded dramatically.
In 2023, the US Department of Defense reported that China had over 370 battle force ships, surpassing the US fleet by 78 ships. By 2030, China aims to have 435 ships, while the US fleet may stay stagnant or even shrink.
Despite the US having fewer ships, theirs are larger and equipped with more firepower. Additionally, the US operates 11 active aircraft carriers compared to China’s two, allowing the US to project power more effectively over vast distances. However, China is catching up, with significant progress on its third aircraft carrier and other naval vessels.
China’s colossal shipyards are the backbone of its naval expansion. For instance, the Changxing Island shipyard, identified via satellite imagery, shows dozens of ships under construction simultaneously.
During World War II, the US dominated shipbuilding, hitting its peak with revered ships like the USS Iowa. However, the 1980s saw the end of subsidies that kept the US industry afloat. Meanwhile, Japan, South Korea, and China continued to heavily subsidize their shipyards. China’s dual-use strategy is particularly notable; the same facilities produce both commercial and military vessels, leveraging billions in government support to build a self-sustaining industry.
Today, US shipyards rely largely on naval contracts. Without a substantial commercial shipbuilding industry, the sector is vulnerable to fluctuations in naval budgets and priorities. This reliance on a single customer makes it difficult to plan for long-term investments and workforce development.
Recent challenges include backlogs, supplier shortages, and rising costs. For example, Pennsylvania’s Philly Shipyard grappled with financial difficulties despite having $1.7 billion in order backlogs, reporting a net loss of more than $67 million in 2023. The US Navy is attempting to address these issues, with a spokesperson stating that they are collaborating closely with industry partners to achieve the necessary speed and scale for a continuous warfighting advantage.
China’s dominance extends beyond military vessels to commercial shipping as well. The nation produces more commercial ships than Japan, South Korea, and Europe combined, maintaining a mammoth share in the global market.
The strategic implications of China’s shipbuilding capacity are profound. In a drawn-out conflict, China’s ability to quickly replace and repair its naval fleet would offer a significant advantage. The US, on the other hand, would face challenges ramping up ship production quickly due to its limited output and aging fleet.
For instance, China routinely launches 20-30 military ships annually, while the US manages just 2-3. Moreover, as China’s shipbuilding expertise grows, it’s increasingly signing massive contracts with global companies. French shipping giant CMA CGM, for example, signed a $3 billion deal with CSSC for 16 container ships, and Taiwanese Evergreen Marine continues to send substantial contracts to Chinese shipyards.
The US is investing heavily in shipbuilding and maintenance, with Congress adding an extra $24 billion over the past eight years. However, the challenge remains substantial. The Navy’s fleet requires costly and time-consuming repairs, while new ships are increasingly expensive and delayed.
The Navy has floated three different versions of a 30-year plan, each requiring a bigger budget—up to $330 billion by 2053. Some experts suggest that to boost its shipbuilding capacity, the US should look to its allies like Japan and South Korea, leading producers of commercial and military vessels.
While the US still holds significant technological advantages, especially with submarines several generations ahead of China’s, the gap is narrowing. China’s shipbuilding prowess and growing fleet size will likely give it leverage in any drawn-out conflict. The US faces a daunting task in ramping up its shipbuilding capabilities and may need to rely on both domestic innovation and international collaboration to meet the challenges ahead.
The stakes are high, and the shipbuilding race between the US and China will inevitably shape the future of global maritime power.
View all